Turkey is about five hours away from
Nigeria by air, about 2, 634 miles from here, but the night there was a coup
attempt in Turkey, July 15, with soldiers shutting down parts of Ankara and
Istanbul, you’d think Ankara is a city somewhere in Nigeria and Istanbul is an
extension of our country.
Commentaries kept flying up and down on
Nigeria social media space, with the coup attempt in Turkey becoming a trending
topic. And yet the strongest connection between Nigeria and Turkey is probably
trade, tourism, socio-cultural affinities, and the fact that many Nigerian
travellers now find it easier and cheaper to travel through Turkey to other
European capitals, with Turkish Airlines making all the profit and no Nigerian
airline on that route! Still, if Turkey finds itself in a bad shape, as it has,
that is not likely to affect the already sorry fortunes of the Naira or the
forbidding cost of food items in Nigerian markets. On Friday, many Nigerians
stayed awake and projected their own worst fears unto the Turkish
situation.
By
way of summary, there was among the Nigerian commentators an all-round
condemnation of any attempt to upturn the Constitutional order either in Turkey
or anywhere else in the world. When it was reported that a former Turkish
President had remarked that the coup will not stand, because “Turkey is not
Africa”, (former President Abdullah Gul actually said Latin America), there was
also a feeling of outrage. How dare he make such a racist comment in the midst
of such a serious situation?
When President Recep Tayyip Erdogan took to Facetime on his mobile phone
to get himself onto television, and he pleaded with the Turkish population to
take to the streets to resist the coup makers, and his call was heeded, not a
few commentators at this end wondered if Nigerians would have answered such a
summon to patriotism and whether or not religious and ethnic sentiments or the
fear of being shot to death would not have kept the people indoors. Concerns
were also expressed about the fate of Nigerians living in Turkey in the event
of a blowout at the crossroads of Europe. By Saturday morning, the coup had
failed.
Erdogan was significantly back in control.
About 200 persons had died, and over 2,000 persons were recorded as injured. As
I monitored the situation in Turkey and the reactions in Nigeria, I was struck
by how so much can be learnt from the strong interest that the failed coup
attempt has generated among educated Nigerians.
Nigerians know what it means to have a
constitutional order derailed by military intervention. Between 1960 and 1999,
Nigeria moved from one form of military rule to another, characterized by
obstinacy, and absolutism, experiencing only short spells of civilian
rule. Similarly, the military in Turkey have since 1960 intervened
directly at least four times (1970, 1971, 1980, 1997). And in all instances,
the Turkish coup plotters always claimed that their role was to restore order
and stabilize the country. This is a rhetoric that is quite familiar to
Nigerians. Every military coup is justified on messianic grounds. In the latest
onslaught in Turkey, the plotters claim they want to establish a “Peace
Council.”
Between 1993 and 1999, Nigerians fought the military to a standstill, insisting
on a definite return to civilian rule and the institutionalization of
democracy. Sixteen years later, the democratic spirit is well established among
the people, if not the Nigerian leadership elite. The people have seen what a
demonstration of people power can achieve: they used it to get the military out
of power, they relied on it to insist that the Constitution be respected and
obeyed when a President died in office and certain forces did not want his
successor to get into office, and again, they have seen people-power at work in
removing a sitting government from power. Right now in Nigeria, to toy
with this power of the people in any form is to sow the seeds of organized mass
rebellion.
Not
surprisingly, in the past few years, every display of the people’s supremacy in
other parts of the world has attracted either interest or a copy-cat instinct
among Nigerians. First, there was the Arab Spring, which resulted in calls for
the Nigerian Spring, which later found expression in the politically motivated
Occupy Nigeria protests of January 2012. And now from Turkey, the major
point of interest for Nigeria has been in my estimation, how the people took to
the streets to confront soldiers.
The coup failed in Turkey because it
lacked popular support. Turkey has for long been considered an
embarrassment in Europe. A successful coup in 2016 would have put the
country in a worse shape and done further damage to the country’s
reputation.
The people stood up for their country,
not President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. They stood up for an idea: The idea of
democracy. The three major political parties disowned the coup. Mosques called
on the people to go to the streets and fight for democracy. Even Erdogan’s
critics, including the Kemalists and the Glulenists, denounced the coup
plotters. The images that came across were images of the police confronting the
soldiers and disarming them (This was intriguing- can anyone ever imagine the
Nigeria police protecting democracy: they would have since collected bribe from
the coup plotters, there is massive corruption in Turkey too but their police
fought for the nation). Ordinary citizens lay down in front of the coup
plotters’ tanks and asked to be crushed; brave citizens disarmed the soldiers
and took over the city squares.
It
is the kind of bravery that Nigerians find surreal. The coup attempt in
Turkey comes at a time when the civil society in Nigeria is beginning to lose
the spirit to stand in front of tanks, and guns: the people have been battered
to a point where their strongest protection is their power of the ballot and so
the average Nigerian endures suffering, convinced that when again it is time to
vote, no one can rob him or her of his power to choose.
But the situation in Turkey reminds us
of the kind of danger that any democracy, with troubled foundations can face,
hence Nigerians ask if they too can be as courageous as the Turkish have been,
with both Turks and the much abused Kurds, and other divided groups, uniting,
momentarily, on one issue.
Not that Mr. Recep Tayyip Erdogan deserves the victory over the coup plotters,
though. Outsiders, including Nigerians, consider him a bad guy; and even if he
is still popular and blindly followed by the majority of his people, his
13-year record in office falls far short of standards. He came to office
on the wave-crest of popular appeal. In Istanbul where he was a city mayor at a
time, he remains immensely popular, and he is also probably the most popular
leader, not in Europe, but the Arab world.
Thrice, he and his party, the AKP, won
nationally organized elections. But success soon got into Erdogan’s head, as he
descended into the lower depths of arrogance and dictatorship. He started
having issues with neighbours and allies.
He
became undemocratic, shamelessly alienating civil society, the press and the
judiciary. He is so temperamental and intolerant of criticism and alternative
views, he is now surrounded mainly by sycophants and relatives. In his
attempt to dominate everything and everyone, he became known as the “buyuk
usta”, that is “the big master”, and of course, he now lives in a $615
million Presidential palace with 1, 150 rooms! In addition, he wants to acquire
US-style executive Presidential powers and he is busy battling, real and
imaginary enemies. He may have been saved by the people’s rejection of the coup
attempt, but perhaps Erdogan has been saved more by his own cleverness.
The
coup attempt against his government was an amateur, unorganized effort. It
lacked the support of the military command, which Erdogan had cleverly
subjected to civilian control, and among whom he had built centres of personal
loyalty. Over the years, he weakened the military and strengthened the police
and the intelligence services. The coup plotters over-estimated their capacity
and misread the people’s mood.
Their failure may embolden Erdogan and even make him more authoritarian: he is
already sounding off about being in charge and dealing with the coup plotters
(over 2,000 of whom have already been rounded up and arrested, even judges have
been fired). But Turkey is in a very bad shape. Resentments run deep.
There are deep fears about threats to the country’s secularism, and attempts to
Islamicise the country. A paranoid Erdogan could worsen the situation.
Both the
United States and the European Union should take a keen interest in what
happens in Turkey after the coup attempt, to ensure that rather than dig deeper
into authoritarianism, Erdogan would see the need to run a more open, inclusive
and democratic government.
The coup may have failed, and democracy may have won, but whatever issues led
to a group of ill-prepared soldiers taking the law into their hands cannot be
wished away. To tell the truth, Recep Erdogan acts very much, in all respects,
like an African leader in Europe - that probably explains the keen Nigerian
interest. The key lesson, all told, is that the importance and survival of
democracy relates to the importance of civic virtue, this is why leaders must
rely not just on the people’s commitment to an idea, but must seek to make
democracy work for all the people.
Tags
Columnists