Attempt
by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to surreptitiously remove the Speaker of
the House of Representatives, Aminu Tambuwal, through an ex-parte application
failed as the trial judge, Justice Ahmed Mohammed, ordered the party to put the
Speaker on notice.
The
court turned down the party’s request for an ex parte order to compel Tambuwal
to vacate his seat as Speaker of the House of Representatives following his
defection from the majority party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC).
PDP’s
counsel, Chief Mike Ahamba (SAN), who argued the application, said Tambuwal had
lost his seat by reason of his defection, according to the provisions of
section 68 of the 1999 Constitution.
The
party joined Tambuwal and the Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives as
respondents in the motion.
It urged the court to order Tambuwal to give effect to the provisions of section 68(1)(g) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) to declare his seat at the House vacant.
It urged the court to order Tambuwal to give effect to the provisions of section 68(1)(g) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) to declare his seat at the House vacant.
PDP
also prayed the court for an alternative order directing the deputy speaker of
the House of to declare the Kebbe/Tambuwal seat vacant by an order of
mandamus.
Also
in the ex parte motion, PDP asked the court to stop Tambuwal from performing or
continuing to perform the function of the Speaker in the House or sitting or
continuing to sit in the House as a member.
A
16-paragraph affidavit in support of the ex parte motion, averred that
Tambuwal, who was sponsored in the 2011 general election by the PDP, has left
the party to join the APC, as he announced on October 28, thereby informing the
House on his present status as required by law.
The
affidavit as deposed to by one James Ugbogu, a lawyer, said it was
constitutional for the House to declare Tambuwal’s seat vacant in the
circumstance of his defection to APC.
Under
Section 53(3) of the 1999 Constitution, the party said: “The deputy speaker
should perform the functions of a speaker of the House in the absence of a
speaker in valid occupancy of the position, or legal incapacitation of the
incumbent speaker.”
The
trial judge, Justice Mohammed, ordered that Tambuwal and other respondents in
the motion be put on notice through substituted means and adjourned till
December 12 for further hearing of the matter.
In
the ex parte request, PDP is challenging the propriety of Tambuwal holding up
to the speakership after defecting to the APC.
The plaintiff is praying the court to compel Tambuwal to vacate his membership of the House, having regard to his defection on October 28.
The plaintiff is praying the court to compel Tambuwal to vacate his membership of the House, having regard to his defection on October 28.
Upon
the refusal of the ex parte application, Justice Mohammed consequently
adjourned till December 12 for hearing.
In a different ruling, Justice Mohammed had also stopped the Chairmen of Kebbe and Tambuwal Local Government Areas in Sokoto State, Bala Konkani and Sambo Bello Modo respectively, from joining as co-defendants in the suit filed by Tambuwal, challenging the removal of his aides and seeking to stop the PDP members in the House to declare his seat vacant.
In a different ruling, Justice Mohammed had also stopped the Chairmen of Kebbe and Tambuwal Local Government Areas in Sokoto State, Bala Konkani and Sambo Bello Modo respectively, from joining as co-defendants in the suit filed by Tambuwal, challenging the removal of his aides and seeking to stop the PDP members in the House to declare his seat vacant.
The
court also stopped three members of the Sokoto State House of Assembly,
Abdulsamad Ibrahim Dasuki (Tambuwal East constituency), Suleiman Hanse
(Tambuwal West constituency) and Shuaib Umar (Kebbe constituency) seeking to be
joined as co-defendants.
The
court stopped them on grounds that their interest in the matter did not align
with that of the defendants and as such could not join as co-defendants.
The
court noted that the interest of the applicants bordered on the seat of
the speaker, adding that Tambuwal, who is the plaintiff in the instant case,
had presented all his requests before the court.
The
applicants had last Friday applied to the court to be joined as co-defendants.
In the suit filed by PDP, the plaintiff is further seeking an order compelling Tambuwal to, in his capacity as speaker, prior to his action, declare vacant the Kebbe/Tambuwal constituency seat, which he represents.
In the suit filed by PDP, the plaintiff is further seeking an order compelling Tambuwal to, in his capacity as speaker, prior to his action, declare vacant the Kebbe/Tambuwal constituency seat, which he represents.
The
plaintiff also wants the court to give express effect to Section 68 (i) (g) of
the 1999 Constitution (as amended).
The section provides that: “A member of the Senate or of the House of Representatives shall vacate his seat in the House of which he is member if being a person whose election to the House was sponsored by a political party and he becomes a member of another political party before the expiration of the period for which that House was elected.”
The section provides that: “A member of the Senate or of the House of Representatives shall vacate his seat in the House of which he is member if being a person whose election to the House was sponsored by a political party and he becomes a member of another political party before the expiration of the period for which that House was elected.”
Tags
Politics