A
Port Harcourt High Court yesterday struck out the suit instituted by the Rivers
State Governor, Hon. Chibuike Amaechi, seeking to restrain the state House of
Assembly from making any move to impeach him.
Amaechi
had gone to court in the wake of the political crisis that rocked the state
last year to seek an order of perpetual injunction to stop an alleged move by
some members of the assembly from removing him from office unlawfully.
Justice
Omereji had last October struck out the originating summons brought by counsel
to Amaechi, Mr. Beluolisa Nwofor (SAN), on the grounds that it was hostile and
ordered that the matter be brought under a statement of claim.
In
their counter-affidavit to the statement of claim, counsel to the five
anti-Amaechi lawmakers, Mr. Dike Udenna, argued that the matter was not
justiceable and that the court cannot reverse itself on a matter it had ruled
on before. Udenna further argued that the order of court was yet to be vacated
by an appellate court.
According
to Udenna, the claimants failed in their statement of claim to prove that the
state Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Chairman and Secretary, Felix Obuah and
Ibibia Walter Opuene respectively, were working with the lawmakers to impeach
the governor, describing the application as speculative, hypothetical and an
academic exercise and therefore should be struck out.
In a ruling that lasted almost two hours, Justice Omereji agreed with the submissions of Udenna and held that the matter was not justiceable as Amaechi failed to disclose the facts when he claimed that the state chairman and secretary of the PDP were planning with the lawmakers of the assembly to impeach him (governor).
In a ruling that lasted almost two hours, Justice Omereji agreed with the submissions of Udenna and held that the matter was not justiceable as Amaechi failed to disclose the facts when he claimed that the state chairman and secretary of the PDP were planning with the lawmakers of the assembly to impeach him (governor).
The
trial judge further held that the allegations against Obuah and Opuene were
heinous, and that making any pronouncement that would affect them without
hearing from them was against the principle of fair-hearing as the claimants
failed to list them as witnesses in the suit.
While
also striking out paragraph 13 of affidavit in support of the statement of claim,
the judge held that the said paragraph cannot confer on the claimant any
reasonable course of action as the claimant counsel was not in place to know
what the second set of defendants and the PDP officials were thinking to do
without a manifestation of those intentions. He further held that the suit was
speculative and hypothetical and as such, unfit for judicial consideration.
The
judge however refused to award any cost on the judgment.
Joined in the suit as first set of defendants are the state House of Assembly and Speaker, Otelemaba Dan-Amachree, while the second set of defendants are Evans Bipi, Kelechi Worgu, Michael Okechukwu Chinda, Martin Amaewhule and Victor Ihunwo.
Joined in the suit as first set of defendants are the state House of Assembly and Speaker, Otelemaba Dan-Amachree, while the second set of defendants are Evans Bipi, Kelechi Worgu, Michael Okechukwu Chinda, Martin Amaewhule and Victor Ihunwo.
Reacting
to the judgment, Udenna described the ruling as detailed and thorough, adding
that: “With the ruling, the lawmakers can go ahead and impeach the governor.
But
on his part, counsel to Amaechi, Nwofor, said he would confer with the governor
on whether to go on appeal, pointing out that the judge failed to consider the
issues raised in the application.
Tags
Politics