The
Federal Ministry of Justice has said there has not been any formal
request from the United States of America (USA) for the extradition of a
chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Ogun State, Mr. Buruji
Kashamu.
A
source at the ministry at the weekend said the said clamour for Kashamu’s
extradition was merely speculative.
The PDP chieftain had been accused by former President Olusegun Obasanjo of having a case to answer on drug-related offences in the US. And that Kashamu fled from the justice process in the US, and so he is a wanted man.
In a telephone conversation, a senior official of the ministry said until such a request comes, there was nothing the federal government can do on the case.
The PDP chieftain had been accused by former President Olusegun Obasanjo of having a case to answer on drug-related offences in the US. And that Kashamu fled from the justice process in the US, and so he is a wanted man.
In a telephone conversation, a senior official of the ministry said until such a request comes, there was nothing the federal government can do on the case.
The
allegation of his alleged criminal past became rife when the PDP
chieftain was appointed leader of the party in the South-west.
Former
President Olusegun Obasanjo had rejected the appointment and threatened to
leave the party, saying that Kashamu a wanted man in the US, is not fit to lead
his zone of the party.
Obasanjo
had, in an open letter to President Goodluck and the leadership of the PDP,
frowned on Kashamu’s elevation as a party leader in the South-west
geo-political zone where the former president hails from, vowing not to
participate in the party’s activities if Kashamu remained at his post.
The
former president described Kashamu, who is the Chairman of the Organisation and
Mobilisation Committee of PDP, South-west, as a “habitual criminal” wanted by
the US government on drug charges.
But speaking at the weekend, the Justice Ministry official who preferred anonymity said all he was aware of, years back, was the request by the British government for which the PDP chieftain had long been cleared.
But speaking at the weekend, the Justice Ministry official who preferred anonymity said all he was aware of, years back, was the request by the British government for which the PDP chieftain had long been cleared.
The
official said the only issue the ministry had taken up with Kashamu was on the
suit he had filed against the federal government to stop his extradition.
He
said the ministry had to challenge the suit because it was not proper to file
suits based on speculations.
“I can tell you that as we speak, the ministry has not received any request from the US on Kashamu’s extradition.
“All we are aware of was that he was arrested in the UK, tried and later released.
“I can tell you that as we speak, the ministry has not received any request from the US on Kashamu’s extradition.
“All we are aware of was that he was arrested in the UK, tried and later released.
“However,
here in Nigeria, the ministry has had to challenge him when it discovered that
he was filing cases in court against the federal government because you don’t
file cases based on speculations.”
But Kashamu has consistently denied wrongdoing, alleging that Obasanjo was crying foul because he had lost relevance in the PDP.
But Kashamu has consistently denied wrongdoing, alleging that Obasanjo was crying foul because he had lost relevance in the PDP.
Meanwhile,
13 years after the judgments he claimed cleared him of wrongdoing were
delivered, Kashamu has applied to a Federal High Court in Abuja to
register two judgments delivered in the United Kingdom against the United
States US government.
The
decisions arose in the suits: Governor of HMP Prison, Brixton Vs Government of
the United States of America Exparte Buruji Kashamu and Government of the
United States of America Vs Buruji Kashamu and delivered on the October 6 and
10, 2000 respectively.
He
claimed that he did not know that he had to register the judgments.
Determined to absolve himself of any criminal activity in the US, a stalwart of the PDP had approached the Federal High Court in Abuja, seeking to register two decisions of courts in the United Kingdom which cleared him of any criminal offence or wrong doing.
Determined to absolve himself of any criminal activity in the US, a stalwart of the PDP had approached the Federal High Court in Abuja, seeking to register two decisions of courts in the United Kingdom which cleared him of any criminal offence or wrong doing.
In
a motion exparte filed by his counsel, Dr. Alex Izinyon (SAN) pursuant to Order
6 Rule 14(1) of the Federal High Court (Civil Rules, 2009 Section 10(a) of the
Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act Cap. F.35 LFN 2004, Buruji
sought to register the two judgments.
Named as respondent to the motion is the Attorney General of England Wales.
Whereas in the judgment of October 6, 2000, District Judge Tim Workman quashed the committal order having found the proceedings against Kashamu unfair because the US government concealed vital identification evidence, the judgment of October 10, 2000, which was a full trial declared that he had no question to answer.
"I am however satisfied that the overwhelming evidence here is such that the identification evidence, already tenuous has now been so undermined as to make it incredible and valueless. In these circumstances, there is no prima facie case against the defendant and I propose to discharge," District Judge Workman said.
In the motion exparte, Izinyon prayed Justice Gabriel Kolawole to grant the applicant "the extension of time within which the applicant shall register the judgments in the suits (a) Governor of HMP Prison, Brixton Vs Government of the United States of America ex-parte Buruji Kashamu & (b) Government of the United States of America vs Buruji Kashamu and delivered on the 6th and 10th October, 2000 respectively.
Named as respondent to the motion is the Attorney General of England Wales.
Whereas in the judgment of October 6, 2000, District Judge Tim Workman quashed the committal order having found the proceedings against Kashamu unfair because the US government concealed vital identification evidence, the judgment of October 10, 2000, which was a full trial declared that he had no question to answer.
"I am however satisfied that the overwhelming evidence here is such that the identification evidence, already tenuous has now been so undermined as to make it incredible and valueless. In these circumstances, there is no prima facie case against the defendant and I propose to discharge," District Judge Workman said.
In the motion exparte, Izinyon prayed Justice Gabriel Kolawole to grant the applicant "the extension of time within which the applicant shall register the judgments in the suits (a) Governor of HMP Prison, Brixton Vs Government of the United States of America ex-parte Buruji Kashamu & (b) Government of the United States of America vs Buruji Kashamu and delivered on the 6th and 10th October, 2000 respectively.
Tags
Politics
Them ask him to visit the USA, if he will return.
ReplyDelete