SENATE President, David Mark, on Wednesday, broke his
silence on the dust raised over the retention of the controversial Section
29(4)(b) of the 1999 Constitution, as he said some of his colleagues were
blackmailed to vote against its deletion as recommended by the Senate committee
on the review of the constitution.
He made this known when he played
host to some women organisations and civil societies that visited the Senate
leadership to press home the need for the lawmakers to revisit the voting
exercise, with a view to deleting the section.
The women organisations were led by
the Minister of Women Affairs, Hajia Zainab Maina; former Minister of
Education, Dr Oby Ezekwezelie; a former Minister of Women Affairs, Mrs
Josephine Anenih; the wife of former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Mrs Maryam Uwais
and the chairperson of the Gender and Constitution Reform Network (GECORN), Mrs
Saadatu Mahdi.
It will be recalled that 35 senators,
led by Sani Ahmed Yerima, had, last week, voted against the recommendation by
the Senate committee on review of the constitution that the sub-section, which
stated that a woman that is married shall be deemed to be of full age, be
deleted, as it was discriminatory against women in respect of renunciation of
the Nigerian citizenship.
Senator Mark said Nigerians should
understand that the Senate was on the side of the people, as he said this was
demonstrated in the fact that 85 senators, out of the 101 present at the
exercise, initially voted for the deletion of the controversial section.
He said some senators, however, got
things mixed up as they introduced religious connotations and thus making the
deletion of the section a sensitive issue, adding that it was subjected to
voting for the second time to avoid religious crisis.
“Why we voted publicly was that
everybody will know the stand of every senator on every issue. I think the
problem is not whether we can delete this Section 29(4)(b) or not. That is not
the issue; it is whether we can get the number to be able to delete it.
“With all due respect, the entire
Senate is being castigated because there was and there is still a complete
misunderstanding of what the Senate had tried to do. We are on the side of the
people, that was why we put it that we should delete it (because) that was what
the people wanted.
“We, in fact, are the first people
that put the step in the right direction of deleting it. It didn’t go through
because of other tangential issues that were brought in on the floor of the
Senate, totally inconsequential issues, unconnected issues that were brought
in.
“We wanted to remove it but it
failed. On that day, we were a total of 101. Eighty five voted and I think
about six or so abstained. There was hardly any dissenting votes, but once it
got mixed up with so many other issues, it didn’t get the required 73 votes
anymore. So, first of all, I think the castigation outside is done out of
misunderstanding.
“But because a religious connotation
was brought into it, which is a very sensitive issue and you must agree with me
that in this country, we try as must as possible not to bring issues that
involves faith to the floor of the Senate and, indeed, the chamber. We keep
religion completely out of it because what is good for a Christian is also good
for a Muslim,” he said.
Mark, however, said the controversial
issue might be revisited if there was enough enlightenment, adding that what
was good for the country was for everybody and not for a particular religious
body or sect.
“I think the bottom line is, when
people get more educated, then we can do a re-think and probably, if the Senate
agrees, go back and see whether we can get the required number once more,
because that is the solution.
“Let me also talk to my own brothers
and sisters who are senators, who were probably blackmailed. That is the fact,
because it is in the open; that I cannot also hide it and nobody can hide it.
“They were simply blackmailed, and on
that day, if they didn’t do what they did, nobody knows the outcome or how the
consequences will be today, because the people outside can say this man, you
are Muslim and didn’t vote for something that is of Islamic interest. If we
don’t hit the nail on the head, we may never get it right,” he said.
Speaking earlier, the chairperson of
GECORN, Mrs Mahdi, while calling for the deletion of the section from the
constitution, said from the moment of birth, the first gift every Nigerians
would receive from the state was citizenship.
“To protect this sacred gift of
citizenship, we advocate for the deletion of Section 29(4)(b) of the 1999
Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
“It is the desire of all Nigerians,
who treasure our citizenship, to remove this provision that provides that young
Nigerian girls, who are not old enough to vote or to obtain a driver licence,
are somehow old enough to renounce their citizenship.
“Citizenship is and must remain
gender-neutral and safeguarded from any cultural, religious or social
interpretations or connotations,” she said.
Mrs Ezekwezelie, who also spoke at
the meeting, commended the Senator Ike Ekweremadu-led committee on the review
of the constitution for deeming it fit to recommend the removal of the
controversial section of the constitution.
She, however, said the Nigerian
society was still rudimentary in following legislative procedures, noting that
the impression the people had was that the attempt to remove the offensive
section was a new bill giving the senators the liberty to marry underage
children.
She promised to educate
Nigerians on the issue, adding that the controversy had become advantageous, as
women and gender issues would now take the front burners in legislative
business.
Tags
Society
Abeg der is more tins to deal wit in out country dan dis, anyone who wants to marry his daùghter at any age should go own, dat is his problem, why try to interven in ppls affair. Haters of religion. Pls stop abusing oda pples religion, urs is not perfect.
ReplyDeleteDon't mind xtians, they always likes 2 pokenose on what is not concern them
ReplyDelete