Nigeria May Impose 3,000 Pounds Bond On UK Visitors

The Federal Government  may opt for a  retaliatory measure  if the United Kingdom went ahead to implement its  proposed £3,000   visa bond.
 Nigeria was said to have made this known during a private meeting between  Foreign Affairs Minister,  Olugbenga Ashiru,  and  British High Commissioner,  Andrew Pocock, in Abuja.
Nigeria is one of the six countries  whose nationals would be required to pay the £3,000  bond under  a proposed policy that will take effect in November. The others are India, Bangledish, Ghana, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.
It was gathered that Pocock admitted at the meeting with Ashiru that the UK planned to introduce the “financial bond as a way of tackling abuse in the immigration system”, but added, “No final decision has been made.”
Ashiru, who was said to have recalled the days when nationals of Commonwealth travelled freely to the UK  and   other member states,  expressed displeasure over the policy which he  described as not only “discriminatory but   capable of undermining the spirit of the Commonwealth family.”
A source privy to the meeting said,  “The minister conveyed the reservations of the Federal Government to Pocock, who  said the policy was still a proposal. The minister reminded him of  British investments in Nigeria and vice-versa.
“He asked him to think about the implications a retaliatory measure would have on the two countries. The minister stressed that Nigeria might also impose £3,000  visa bond on British nationals coming into the country too.”
After the meeting, the ministry issued a statement in which it recalled “the strong historical bonds between the peoples of the various countries who were all regarded at that time as Commonwealth citizens.”
It  further “recalled that this time-honoured practice was unilaterally jettisoned by the UK   in 1985, thereby weakening the bonds of the Commonwealth family.”
According to the statement by  the spokesperson  for  the ministry, Ogbole Ode, Ashiru told the British envoy  “that the proposed policy would definitely negate the joint commitment by Prime Minister David Cameron and President Goodluck Jonathan to double the volume of bilateral trade between the two countries by 2014.”
 It added, “Ambassador Ashiru pointed out that the decision of the UK government is coming at the time the Commonwealth Foreign Ministers have unanimously recommended for adoption at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting   in November 2013, a proposal to  remove visa requirements for holders of official and diplomatic passports from member states.”
Ashiru,  who appealed to the UK to reconsider the proposed policy,   noted “that the Federal Government has a responsibility to take appropriate measures to protect the interests of Nigerians, who may be affected by it (policy), if finally introduced.
“The minister informed the British High Commissioner that the Federal Government values the very cordial relations and strategic partnership between the two countries and would not want the introduction of any new policy to affect these cherished relations,” the statement added.
In  its own  statement,  the British High Commission reiterated that  details of the policy were  still being worked out. “No final decision has been made,” the  Head of Press and Public Affairs Section, Rob Fitzpatrick said.
The commission said, “if the plan were to go ahead in Nigeria,  it would affect only a very small number of the highest risk visitors.”
The statement added, “The vast majority would not be required to pay a bond.  Those paying bonds would receive the bond back, if they abided by the terms of their visa.
“Let me put this in perspective.  Over 180,000 Nigerians apply to visit the UK each year.  About 70 per cent  or around 125,000, of those applicants are successful.  Travel between our two countries is a key part of our strong cultural and business relationship.  Financial bonds would be focussed on only a tiny minority of potential abusers.  It would not  be a “£3,000 visa charge” as some media reporting has alleged.
“As soon as more details of the policy have been decided, we will inform the Nigerian government and public fully and officially, in the spirit of our long standing friendship, and our wish to help bona fide Nigerian visitors to work, study or do business in the UK.”

Also in Abuja, the  Senate  raised its voice against the proposed visa policy  and  warned that Nigeria would have to adopt  the principle of reciprocity if the UK went ahead to implement it.

CKN NEWS

Chris Kehinde Nwandu is the Editor In Chief of CKNNEWS || He is a Law graduate and an Alumnus of Lagos State University, Lead City University Ibadan and Nigerian Institute Of Journalism || With over 2 decades practice in Journalism, PR and Advertising, he is a member of several Professional bodies within and outside Nigeria || Member: Institute Of Chartered Arbitrators ( UK ) || Member : Institute of Chartered Mediators And Conciliation || Member : Nigerian Institute Of Public Relations || Member : Advertising Practitioners Council of Nigeria || Fellow : Institute of Personality Development And Customer Relationship Management || Member and Chairman Board Of Trustees: Guild Of Professional Bloggers of Nigeria

4 Comments

  1. Oga H.C that wan na grammar. The imposition of the Bond should not come into play.
    It is not only your country that needs to be protected from ill immigrants, we also need to do same and recognise same just like you.
    Gosh!!! You guys are the very reasons why discremination as a word was ever spoken and racisim as a reality ever came to be.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is obvious they want to stop the average living Nigerians from entering the UK come to think of it, i want to visit the UK for shopping or something i will then save about 750,000 thousand naira before i can leave my country where on earth is the money for shopping. Well it will be of our best interest if they will also pay £10,000 to come to Nigeria it will add a great value to Nigeria as a country.

    ReplyDelete
  3. dont mind dis nonsence british, the whole countries imposed by this stupid laws will also implement against them and who will loose? Allow them to implement it and they will suffer most

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post

نموذج الاتصال