FORMER President Ibrahim Babangida, yesterday, slammed
elder-statesman Chief Edwin Clark over his allegation that some Northern
leaders including him, Babangida, were soft on the Boko Haram insurgency.
In a stout rebuttal to the assertion, Babangida alleged
that sense may indeed have departed from Clark and hence his disregard for the
historic role he (Babangida) played in unifying the country.
Ex -President Ibrahim Babangida and elder-statesman Chief
Edwin Clark
Affirming that he had no reason to play politics with the
issue having left the ‘political industry’, Babangida traced the difficulties
of the Jonathan administration to divisive people he said were of the same
mindset with Clark, who have prevented the present administration from seeking
reasonable counsel from those that could help it.
He specifically alluded to former Heads of State who he
claimed were not being consulted by the present administration.
Babangida spoke in response to Clark’s claims last
Wednesday that some northern leaders were behind the increasing spate of
violence in the country.
Clark spoke as guest speaker at the second State of the
Federation Lecture organised by the Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal
Studies, NIALS.
Clark had specifically challenged Babangida and former
Head of State, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari to condemn the activities of the Boko
Haram group that has claimed responsibility for the insurgency campaign in many
parts of the north.
Clark noting the joint declaration by former President
Olusegun Obasanjo and Babangida on the spate of insecurity had said at the
lecture:
“Boko Haram preceded Jonathan. It started in 2002 when
Obasanjo was President. It was there when Yar’Adua was also ruling. It is not
synonymous with Jonathan. I had expected that somebody like Babangida should
have spoken since. I thought he would have spoken with his friend Buhari. Two
of them have been meeting. So why is he now with Obasanjo?
“At 72, Babangida said he will wear uniform and fight for
the unity of Nigeria, he should therefore stand up now and condemn Boko Haram
from the bottom of his heart, not with Obasanjo. Obasanjo has gone to Maiduguri
to meet the people, why has Babangida not gone?” he asked.
But responding yesterday, in a statement issued by his
spokesman, Kassim Afegbua, Babangida said:
“The statement reportedly credited to Chief Edwin Clark
on Friday, August 3, 2012 in several newspapers and online media to the effect
that General IBB has a hand in Boko Haram, is the subject of this response. We
are ashamed to state here that rather than coming up with plausible and
efficacious solution[s] to the insecurity in the country, what the
self-acclaimed elder statesman came up with was buck-passing, such odium and
rancid outburst, to the extent of trying to accuse General Ibrahim Babangida on
the Boko Haram menace. We view this misguided and senseless statement in very
bad taste and we take very strong exceptions to his drooling and implied
conclusion.
I ‘ll not work against Nigeria’s unity, stability
“For the purpose of putting the records straight, General
Ibrahim Babangida, Grand Commander of the Federal Republic, former President
and Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces and civil war hero, does not and
will not have a hand in anything untoward against the unity and stability of
the Nigerian State. Having seen it all in life, and now enjoying his retirement
in Minna, Niger State, General Ibrahim Babangida has paid his dues by serving
his fatherland to the best of his ability at various times in the history of
the country.
“Having invested so much in the unity and stability of
the country, to the extent of fighting in the civil war to keep the country
together, it is out of place for anyone, least of all an old man of Edwin
Clark’s nomenclature, to input directly or indirectly that the great IBB should
prove his innocence on the Boko Haram menace.
“We want to believe that Chief Edwin Clark was quoted out
of context, but if indeed he did say what was credited to him, we are forced to
accept the conclusion that on account of his age, his senses have since
departed him. He needs our empathies and not sympathies. We have since known
Chief Edwin Clark to be a loose cannon in public discourse. He deserves our
pity.
“We were expecting Chief Edwin Clark to use the
opportunity of his forum to advance solutions to the insecurity situation in
the country with particular reference to the Boko Haram crisis. General Ibrahim
Babangida has offered several approaches and methodologies to addressing the
precarious situation both in public and private, and had stated without
equivocation that dialogue would serve as a better tool than this militant
approach which is not yielding appropriate result.
“He had also stated that President Goodluck Jonathan
should use some of the respected Muslim clerics in the North as middlemen to
reach members of Boko Haram and appeal for calm and understanding, in the
interest of the unity and stability of the system. Needless to state that
Government is a huge institution with several options open to it. And the
earlier we discard this old method of reactionary approach and adopt a
proactive one, in handling sensitive situations such as the one under
reference, the better it will be for the country.
“With ethnic mindset of a Chief Edwin Clark, we can
understand why the country appears fixated and why there has not been
nationally accepted approach to combating this Boko Haram menace. Anyone who
sees the Boko Haram menace as strictly a Northern affair would be exhibiting
crass ignorance about leadership in a multi-ethnic configuration like Nigeria.”
Babangida who reiterated the need for a collective
responsibility in nipping in the bud the problem, said, “the earlier we began
the patriotic process of viewing challenges as collective responsibility, the
better it would be for getting solutions to the problem. When ethnic jingoists
speak and reason in the manner that Chief Edwin Clark did, then we have a huge
problem on our hands.
“Former President, General Ibrahim Babangida has no hand
in the present challenges facing President Goodluck Jonathan, and the
insecurity in the country. In fact, it is IBB’s belief that some of the
problems were inherited by the present administration. IBB has since left the
political turf for the younger generation of Nigerians. He has said repeatedly
that he will no longer be an applicant in the political industry in Nigeria
until Allah calls him home.
‘’Rather than crucify General IBB for nothing, Chief
Edwin Clark should blame the corruption in the system and the several
incompetence and inadequacies of the present system.
Instead of buck-passing and playing the blame game, we
expect Edwin Clark to advise the government of the day to do more of
consultation with former presidents, opinion moulders and leaders of thoughts across
the country with the aim of getting lasting and integrated solutions to our
problems.
Let it be noted that further implied statements and
misplaced accusations from Chief Edwin Clark would be greeted with litigation.
A word is enough for the aged.”
"Let it be noted that further implied statements and misplaced accusations from Chief Edwin Clark would be greeted with litigation. A word is enough for the aged.”
ReplyDelete...IBB might as well send a 'LETTER BOMB' to the elder statesman. Litigation is not going to alter the truth.